Tag Archives: Apple

The new Apple Mac mini makes even less sense

In the past we’ve noted Apple’s insane pricing for their (claimed) entry level Apple PC, the Mac mini. With the latest model released in the past couple of weeks, Apple adds another key reason to avoid the Mac mini, in the continued pointless eroding of customer-replaceable parts. In a rather detailed review from Ars Technica, special mention is made of Apple now sealing off easy access to the device’s innards and the hard-soldering of system memory to its motherboard:

“Older Minis had a round plastic cap on the bottom. Twisting it off would give easy access to the computer’s two RAM slots, and enterprising techies with a screwdriver and a little know-how could lift out the rest of the parts and perform further upgrades… The 2014 Mini still has the plastic hatch on the bottom, but it no longer twists off… now instead of seeing the Mini’s guts you see yet another metal shield, held in place with Torx Security screws. Remove that shield, and after you pull the entire motherboard out and flip it over you’ll finally see that the new Mac Mini’s RAM is soldered directly to the motherboard. It’s no longer user-upgradeable, so make sure you order all the RAM you need when you buy the computer in the first place.”

This continues the generally anti-consumer trend Apple has firmly established in their other products (iPhones, MacBook Pros, et al). The removal of easy access to customer-upgradeable parts is especially relevant to small businesses: unless your organisation is flush with cash, can afford to replace computers outright or can tolerate multi-week outages while your faulty Mac mini is sitting at an Apple service centre, there is little reason to consider the mini in its present incarnation.

If you’re not bound to Apple OS X for any mission-critical applications, then the Intel NUC running Ubuntu makes a more attractive proposition at an even more compact size – which we’ll be covering in a future post or two:

Intel NUC compared to Apple Mac mini

Advertisements

Mac OS X killed the Linux desktop? I must have missed the memo (and so did Google)…

Bizarre little opinion piece by Miguel de Icaza proclaiming the death of the Linux desktop. A little excerpt:

True story.

The hard disk that hosted my /home directory on my Linux machine failed so I had to replace it with a new one. Since this machine lives under my desk, I had to unplug all the cables, get it out, swap the hard drives and plug everything back again.

Pretty standard stuff. Plug AC, plug keyboard, plug mouse but when I got to the speakers cable, I just skipped it.

Why bother setting up the audio?

It will likely break again and will force me to go on a hunting expedition to find out more than I ever wanted to know about the new audio system and the driver technology we are using….”

Here’s my true story. I have a number of Ubuntu Linux desktops, and all are a joy to use. Ubuntu Linux has been fast and stable. The Unity interface is quite lovely (after some initial reservations). Software package installation is incredibly slick (and has been for years), and I couldn’t be happier with the quality of desktop applications. And I’ve never had a problem with audio support either for that matter. I switched from Mac OS late in 2007, partly because the money I was paying for the privilege wasn’t delivering in the areas where Ubuntu excels – and its ties to proprietary hardware (or beyond proprietary as Scott McNealy would say) generally make it a proposition for the well moneyed.

I’ve maintained hundreds and hundreds of desktop Windows and Mac OS computers in my time, so I’ve got a fairly good handle on the pros and cons of each, especially with regard to stability and ease of use. Is Ubuntu a superior desktop OS to Windows? No question. Even if Microsoft were to drop the price of Windows to zero (as if) it would still be an average product. Is Ubuntu comparable to Mac OS X, for common productivity and entertainment activities? Absolutely, especially in its current LTS incarnation.

So: I’m not sure where I’m going wrong, but Ubuntu has been nothing short of a fantastic desktop OS for me. The irony is that I don’t use it on the server, preferring Illumos/OpenIndiana due to a number of compelling advantages from its OpenSolaris roots. Why does the author feel the need to make negative comparisons to Mac OS? Why even bring up the old bugbear of Linux on the desktop at all?

I think I hear an axe being ground.

Incidentally, Google apparently didn’t get the author’s memo either…

http://www.zdnet.com/the-truth-about-goobuntu-googles-in-house-desktop-ubuntu-linux-7000003462/